PMA Logo Image


Present Protection in Alberta Image

Purpose and Objectives of Report Image

     Concepts of a Criterion-based Evaluation Image

Criteria used to Measure Geological Signifance Image

    Criteria used to Measure Degree of Threat Image

   Criteria used to Measure Interpretive Value Image

Geological Significance Evaluation Form Image

  Degree of Threat Evaluation Form Image

Educational/Interpretive Evaluation Form Image

Proposed Procedure for Site Evaluation Image

Thematic Classification Scheme for Sites (Alberta) Image

Management Considerations for Protection of Sites Image

Conclusion Text Image

Site Evaluation Tables Image

         Credits Image

           Links Image

          Menu Image

           Home Image

           E-mail us!

 

Management Considerations for Protection of Sites Text Image

 

Geological Sites

Once a geological site has been identified as a candidate for protective action, emphasis will switch to the appropriate mechanism to ensure its preservation. Ideally, a harmonious balance needs to be reached between protection of a feature and its utilization. For most geological sites, an attempt should be made to protect and preserve the feature, while ensuring access for scientific research and education. An effective program can also contribute towards the public's understanding and appreciation of a site. For example, the Okotoks Erratic and the Frank Slide (both in Alberta) have protection as Provincial Historic Resources. Certain activities have been restricted but access to each site does exist and they have successful and popular interpretive programs. This type of protected site, with only slightly limited access, will need a management plan to monitor its status and condition on a regular basis.

 

Fossil Sites

In some situations, a feature may require protection as well as limited access. Sensitive fossil localities often fall into this category. Fossil localities form a distinct group of geological features with particular protection and preservation problems. Many fossils left in the field will eventually be damaged or destroyed by erosion and weathering. Fossils in resistant rock, however, are not necessarily threatened, and can be exposed to the elements for much longer periods and still remain intact. Thus, tactics can range from protecting fossils in the field to removing the specimens to an institution such as a museum, university or college for safe-keeping or research.

Most fossils have more educational and scientific value after they have been collected and removed to an institution where they can be prepared and studied. For this reason, there is a general consensus among paleontologists and in the literature that there be unimpeded professional scientific access to fossiliferous rocks for assessment and collection as long as a long-term preservation protocol for the collections is part of the research program. These issues make it a necessity for paleontologists to be involved in making a reliable evaluation of a fossil-bearing site. 

 


Back to Thematic Classification Scheme for Geological Sites (Alberta)  Menu Image  Next to Conclusion


Royal Alberta Museum
780-453-9100
12845-102 Avenue, Edmonton, T5N 0M6
Copyright © 1999-2008, Royal Alberta Museum


URL: http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca